"Give us the tools and we shall do the job.” So said Winston Churchill in the darkest days of World War II. At that time Churchill was appealing to the Americans to provide Britain with weapons to hold off the Nazis. Sadly, Britain with some exceptions entered the war with outdated weapons and insufficient equipment. Many Britons undoubtedly lost their lives due to the priorities of its pre-War governments. Similarly Canada has a long history of sending its citizen soldiers in harms way without the equipment they needed.
In WWI our troops were equipped with the Ross rifle which did not withstand the rigours of trench warfare. The Royal Canadian Navy barely survived between the wars and entered WWII with only 11 ships. More recently, replacements for the aging Sea King helicopters were cancelled and our troops were sent to Afghanistan with Iltis jeeps and without appropriate uniforms. In all instances our service people responded magnificently but at greater cost than was necessary.
Fortunately, Canadians recognize that our forces need the best equipment available and recent government decisions seem to be reflecting that recognition. The F-35 contract is proceeding. Our pilots will be able to fly with the best from our NATO allies. The recent award of two shipbuilding contracts to the best yards in Canada is a model for non-politicized procurement. We are also pleased that programs such as the Canadian Innovation Commercialization Program (CICP) and Defence Industrial Research Program (DIRP) are available.
CICP was the subject of an earlier newsletter and is on M-TEAMS’ Blog for reference. It applies to procurements from all government departments. However, DIRP is a specific program targeting the Department of National Defence. Under DIRP DND will providing matching funds up to $500,000 for the development of leading edge technologies. According to the DIRP website “ The primary objective of the DIRP is to support the strategic research interests of the Canadian Forces and to introduce new and innovative technologies into the Department of National Defence.” This can only benefit our forces and the men and women who serve in them.
This Remembrance Day as we reflect on the human toll of more than 100 years of Canada’s wars and military commitments it’s good to know that there is a peacetime commitment to provide those who serve with the best that is available. We should give them the best tools to do their jobs. Lest we Forget.
Titled “Innovation Canada: A Call to Action”, the Government’s Expert Panel chaired by Tom Jenkins released its report recommending sweeping changes to Canada’s R&D support programs. Recommendations include:
1. Creating an Industrial Research and Innovation Council (IRIC), with a clear business innovation mandate
2. Simplifying the Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&ED) program by basing the tax credit for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) on labour-related costs
3. Making business innovation one of the core objectives of government procurement, with the supporting initiatives to achieve this objective
4. Transforming the institutes of the National Research Council (NRC) into a constellation of large-scale, sectoral collaborative R&D centres involving business, the university sector and the provinces
5. Help high-growth innovative firms access the risk capital they need through the establishment of new funds where gaps exist
6. Establish a clear federal voice for innovation, and engage in a dialogue with the provinces to improve coordination and impact
Much as been written already about the report and this newsletter will offer only a few brief comments for now.
Simplifying the SR&ED program is a good idea. However, eliminating materials will hurt our manufacturing base. Manufacturing experiments can be extremely costly in materials consumed. Hasn’t the manufacturing sector suffered enough?
Expanding the pilot Canadian Innovation Commercialization Program (CICP) is a good idea. It’s a program that could benefit both Canadian innovators and taxpayers.
Transforming NRC makes sense. The institutes have struggled (or maybe not struggled) to be relevant to industry.
Focusing on high-growth firms runs the risk of the Government trying to pick winners; something at which they are notoriously unsuccessful.
Hopefully, the Government will neither shelve this report nor legislate its contents verbatim. If you are concerned obtain a copy of the report, read it, and address concerns to your MP and/or business/industrial association. It’s too important to let this one slide.